|
RPE-BP:
More
than just a bonded palatal
expander, the RPE-BP system
is the cornerstone to Dr.
Alpern's treatment philosophy.
Posterior bite planes vertically
unload the TMJ and free
up the occlusion for faster,
more patient friendly treatment.
After rapid palatal expansion
is completed, the posterior
bite plane becomes the
platform from which numerous
treatment objectives can
be achieved.
It
acts as a disposable anchorage
for use with accessories
such as: Class II hooks,
Class III Reverse Pull
Hooks, Cross Bite Hooks,
Lingual Whip Springs, Arch
Wire Tubes, and Lip Bumper
Tubes. An ingenious removal
system built into the bite
planes solves the problems
associated with debonding
these types of appliances. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
BPHGT (Bite
Plane Headgear Tube Appliance):
Dr.
Alpern designed this appliance
to address two potential
situations encountered
during orthodontic treatment.
The need for a more efficient
method of treating Class
II division I and II deep
bite malocclusions, and
the patient abruptly informing
you that their jaw is suddenly
clicking, popping, and
hurting in the middle of
treatment.
The
BPHGT unlocks the occlusion
and frees up the bite so
that orthodontic forces,
as well as vertical unloading
of the TMJ, can occur simultaneously.
Because
the appliance is fixed
(inserted into molar tubes
and then ligated) patient
compliance concerns are
eliminated. By matching
the body wire size to that
of your existing molar
tubes, it can be added
to any existing molar buccal
tube assemblies preventing
the need for rebanding
or an appliance change.
The
lab requires a maxillary
model with a very clear,
accurate impression of
the molar tubes. It is
important that the size
of the existing molar tubes
be noted on the prescription.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
MIROS (Molar
Incisal Resting Orthopaedic
Splint):
Developed
out of Dr. Alpern's frustration
with Functional appliances,
the MIROS was designed
to give maximal orthopaedic
effect to the mandible;
and to attempt, in as strong
a way as possible, to control
the vertical growth of
the posterior maxillary
area. It has a maximal
orthopaedic effect forward
on the condylar head by
solidly gripping the lower
incisors and cuspids and
preventing a forward tipping
movement.
The
design is stronger and
yet less bulky than most
functional appliances.
The lab requires a maxillary
and mandibular model along
with a construction bite
reflecting the desired
position of the mandible.
Dr. Alpern recommends that
for every millimeter of
advancement you allow 3mm
of vertical opening.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Multi-Functional
Appliance:
This
appliance combines the
MIROS with the RPE-BP for
the simultaneous achievement
of true maxillary palatal
expansion, and the orthopaedic
protraction of the mandible.
This is accomplished with
a unique tube and pin design.
It is this tube and pin
attachment that permits
maxillary expansion and
mandibular protraction
from one appliance. The
lab requires a maxillary
and mandibular model along
with a construction bite
reflecting the desired
position of the mandible.
Again, Dr. Alpern recommends
that for every millimeter
of advancement you allow
3mm of vertical opening.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
IWTO
Retainer (Invisible
Without The Occlusal):
The
first maxillary invisible
retainer without occlusal
coverage. It is designed
to give maximum retention,
esthetics, comfort and
speech function while permitting
full dental cusp/fossa
interdigitation and unencumbered
TMJ freedom of motion.
The posterior region can
be trimmed below the height
of contour to allow for
settling or above the height
of contour to maintain
the existing position as
desired. A small lip covers
the incisal edge of the
centrals and laterals to
act as a stop that prevents
the retainer from slipping
gingivally. The lab requires
an accurate maxillary model
that includes the maxillary
tuberosity. This is very
important to the success
of the appliance because
a sufficient amount of
plastic in this region
is needed for circumferential
strength.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
IWTE
Retainer (Invisible
With The Edge):
A
variation of the IWTO used
specifically for retention
of open bite cases where
some settling of the anterior
teeth might be desirable.
The lip covering the incisal
edge of the centrals and
laterals from the IWTO
design is eliminated and
the anteriors are left
free to settle. A plastic
edge covers the buccal
cusp of the first bicuspid
to prevent the retainer
from slipping gingivally.
This edge is tapered into
the fossa to prevent occlusal
interference. The posterior
region is trimmed above
the height of contour to
hold the existing position.
As with the IWTO, the lab
requires an accurate maxillary
model that includes the
maxillary tuberosity. This
is very important to the
success of the appliance
because a sufficient amount
of plastic in this region
is needed for circumferential
strength.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
CCR (Continuous
Clear Retainer):
For
those cases that do not
offer enough maxillary
tuberosity to properly
fabricate the IWTO, Dr.
Alpern recommends his CCR
design. It has no wires
crossing from buccal to
lingual and no interference
with occlusion and settling.
There is much greater control
of corrected positions
due to circumferential
retention from centrals
to second molars and broad
coverage (5-6mm) on the
labial side.
Patients like
it because it has
no wires visible from the
labial side making it more
esthetically pleasing.
The labial acrylic section
is attached to circumferential
molar clasps with small
elastics, giving it a great
deal of flexibility and
the ability to reposition
anterior teeth like a spring
retainer. The lab requires
an accurate maxillary model
that extends past the second
molars. It is important
that the second molars
are included in order to
properly fit the circumferential
molar clasps.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Super
Spring Retainer:
An
active appliance designed
to provide efficient and
consistent rotation and
tipping of desired anteriors.
This is enhanced by helical
springs positioned vertically
for a maximum amount of
seating flexibility and
continuous force. Clasping
is provided by distal extensions
that engage lingual undercuts
on the bicuspids and first
molars. The lab requires
an accurate mandibular
model and an opposing arch
if resets may be effected
by a limited amount of
overjet.
|